Summary Judgement

Hughes v. Rodriguez

Submitted by Re'Neisha Stevenson on Thu, 10/27/2022 - 12:18

For purposes of ruling on a motion for summary judgment, a district court may properly view the facts in the light depicted by bodycam footage and its accompanying audio, to the extent the footage and audio blatantly contradict testimonial evidence” (emphasis in original.

Daniels v. City of Pittsburgh et. al.

Submitted by Jane Clayton on Thu, 10/13/2022 - 16:36

Daniels v. City of Pittsburgh et. al. addresses the case of Mark Daniels, who was running away when he was shot in the back and killed by a Pittsburgh police officer. Mr. Daniels was not armed but the officer believed that Mr. Daniels had shot at him earlier the same day. The district court granted summary judgment for the defendants relying in large part on the officer's unsworn statements in his use of force report even though there was evidence in the record contradicting these statements.