In suit by children of wrongfully convicted father, court holds substantive due process right to family integrity is not implicated whenever a state deprives a child of interaction with parent through wrongful incarceration; claim requires that official act with culpable state of mind directed at family relationship.
Well established in this Circuit that carrying a weapon, without more, does not justify an officer’s choice to shoot”; where jury could conclude that suspect was dropping weapon, not threatening anyone with it, officer would violate clearly established rights by shooting him; court notes that “the intensity of the situation emanated not from [the suspect], but from the volume and vigor of the officer’s commands.
In suit by inmate alleging state psychologists discriminated against him on basis of race and religion in preparation of reports for parole boards, court rules psychologists were not entitled to absolute judicial immunity.