First Amendment claim for retaliatory prosecution accrued when plaintiff learned that defendants had indicted him on charges that he believed to be retaliatory, thus statute of limitations began to run when plaintiff was indicted, not when he was acquitted.
Use of stun gun on subject of 911 suicide call who had rope around his neck connected to basketball hoop did not violate clearly established 4th Amendment right.
Officers who stopped vehicle because they claimed they could not read the temporary license plate tag in vehicle’s rear window and because a passenger gave them a suspicious look, violated plaintiff’s clearly established rights and were not entitled to qualified immunity, affirming summary judgment in favor of plaintiff; failure to make out the tag did not constitute a particularized basis for believing vehicle was unregistered.
City’s systematic addition of driver’s license check to otherwise valid sobriety checkpoint was objectively reasonable under 4th Amendment.