Manriquez v. Ensley

Submitted by Re'Neisha Stevenson on Tue, 11/01/2022 - 10:19

Officers got search warrant to search plaintiff’s motel room, then got oral approval from judge to search his house, but did not physically amend the warrant; search of home violated 4th Amendment, but officers awarded qualified immunity because law was unclear that warrant had to be physically amended; dissent by Judge Otake with respect to qualified immunity, on ground that particularity requirement of 4th Amendment is clear.

Citation
Actionable Conduct Edition