Denial of motion for preliminary injunction reversed because plaintiffs were likely to succeed on merits of Fourth Amendment claim based on aerial surveillance program in which multiple planes flew orbits over city photographing 32 square miles per image per second, obtaining an estimated twelve hours of coverage of around 90% of the city each day, in effect tracking every movement of every person outside in the city, allowing identification of individuals through analysis of points on their location history; action was not moot, although program was discontinued.
Citation
Actionable Conduct Edition